Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Guttermouth's avatar

Here's my problem with this. Here is the bulleted list with which you begin the essay:

Mask vs. no mask

Vaccine or no vaccine

Go outside or stay in the house

What’s a valid protest?

How far is proper social distancing?

Is “whiteness” the downfall of mankind?

Amen and Awomen

How many people can legally gather in a private home for a Christmas party?

2+2=5

Fox or MSNBC

There is no "middle ground," no "50-yard line," for 95% of these. (I don't give a shit what network news channel you watch.

I feel not even slightly inclined to give ground on ANY of the items on that list. There is no logical reason to do so, and they are intrusions upon me, if not outright attacks upon me.

I am not even remotely interested in compromise on any of these points. I will not consent to any COVID theatre bullshit, I will not apologize for any aspect of my race, I will not concede the objective truths of mathematics or anything else. There are no 50-yard lines to any of these things.

Am I one of these bad guys that's part of the problem? Help me understand how the top half of the essay lines up with your calls for appeasement and compromise and unity.

Expand full comment
FedUpInOR's avatar

I used to think ‘if only my side won’ (politically) everything would ‘get better,’ but it doesn’t. You know why? Because it’s US against huge corporations and billionaires. Not US vs Them (politically), both sides in politics are the same

Expand full comment
30 more comments...

No posts